As cyber threats continue to evolve, businesses worldwide are seeking more robust measures to protect their sensitive data and critical systems. A solution that is gaining traction is Zero Trust Architecture (ZTA), a concept centered on the idea of "never trust, always verify." In this recent episode of the S-RM Insider podcast, host Stephen Ross discusses the core principles, challenges, and practical steps involved in implementing Zero Trust with Head of Restoration and Recovery Tom Yoxall, and cybersecurity Associate Director Matthew Mettenheimer.
Listen to the S-RM Insider podcast
|
|
|
|
What is Zero Trust architecture?
Zero Trust Architecture represents a paradigm shift from traditional network security models, which typically revolve around the idea of a secure perimeter. As Tom explains, Zero Trust assumes that threats can come from both inside and outside the network, hence, every user's identity and access must be verified every time they request access—regardless of their location.
Matthew emphasizes the relevance of Zero Trust by noting that, in today's cybersecurity landscape, it's not a question of if an organization will be breached, but when:
I might have the best firewalls in the game, we might have a really strong exterior network, but should someone get in, we want to minimize the potential impact that they can do. So it's really about building a lot of resiliency and that's why I think we're seeing more and more organisations turn to looking to implement zero trust than your traditional models.” Matt Mettenheimer
Core principles and challenges of Zero Trust
Implementing Zero Trust involves adherence to several core principles.
- Explicit verification: Confirm every user's identity before granting them access to corporate data and systems. This includes implementing Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) and Conditional Access, where possible.
- Least privilege access: Restrict user permissions to only what is necessary for their role. For instance, employees without a need to access financial systems should have no awareness or access rights to them.
- Assume breach: Organizations should operate under the assumption that a breach has already occurred. This mindset encourages verified access to applications and systems, limiting trust levels and ensuring verification processes are always applied.
The multi-layered approach of Zero Trust applies not only to identities and users but also spans across devices, processes, endpoints, networks, and data—requiring a coordinated defense strategy that may present technical challenges. Matt points out the potential high costs and the operational demands of deploying Zero Trust, which might deter some companies. This complex setup necessitates significant human and financial investment, pressing organizations to weigh these factors against potential cybersecurity risks.
One of the core phrases you'll hear around zero trust is never trust, but always verify, and it really is taking that to the next level." Tom Yoxall
Who should consider Zero Trust?
Organizations most likely to benefit from Zero Trust are those in highly regulated industries, such as finance, due to stringent compliance requirements and severe implications of data breaches. Similarly, companies with high cyber maturity levels or those with low thresholds for service disruption, like online retailers, should consider implementing Zero Trust to maintain continuous operations and minimize downtime due to cyber events.
However, for smaller or less mature organizations, where basic cybersecurity measures like Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) are not yet in place, Zero Trust might be a premature step. Mettenheimer advises these organizations to first establish foundational cybersecurity measures before advancing to sophisticated frameworks like Zero Trust.
The first thing you need to look at is the business requirements. What are you trying to achieve and why are you trying to achieve it? So the first thing when you're coming into a zero trust network architecture is really understanding what your attack surface is. What are you protecting?" Tom Yoxall
Steps to implement Zero Trust
Organizations deciding to implement Zero Trust should start by defining their business and security requirements. Tom underscores the importance of understanding the attack surface—knowing what sensitive data and critical applications need protection. Subsequently, login details, access needs, and permissions associated with these assets should be systematically defined.
Threat modelling should be conducted next. This involves identifying potential cyber threats, assessing user roles in relation to critical systems, and gauging the potential impact of compromised accounts. Following this, pinpointing the appropriate technology to support the architecture, alongside a clear implementation strategy, becomes crucial.
A key takeaway, highlighted by Tom, is to remember that Zero Trust is an architecture philosophy, not a singular product. Organizations must foster an integrated defense approach, aligning multiple platforms to fully realize Zero Trust benefits.
Key advice
Before diving head-first into Zero Trust, Matt advises organizations to assess their current cybersecurity maturity level and readiness to maintain such a framework. Should there be any uncertainty, consulting with cyber advisors or insurance partners can provide valuable insights into best practices and readiness levels for implementing Zero Trust.
Steve concludes by urging organizations to seek expert consultation when contemplating Zero Trust Architecture to ensure a smooth, strategic, and impactful rollout. By engaging in conversations with cybersecurity professionals, businesses can better map out necessary steps, potential challenges, and available accelerators in their Zero Trust journey.
In summary, as more companies recognize the unpredictable nature of cyber threats and embrace measures like Zero Trust Architecture, understanding its principles, potential hurdles, and tailored implementation steps will be crucial in ensuring sustainable cyber resilience for modern enterprises.
